Saturday, July 26, 2014

Kingfisher Airlines withdraws its plea in SC



Monday, 21 July 2014 - 7:07pm IST | Agency: PTI

Kingfisher Airlines today withdrew in the Supreme Court its appeal against Karnataka High Court's verdict allowing a consortium of banks led by SBI to take possession of its prestigious property Kingfisher House in Mumbai.
As soon as the matter came for hearing before a bench headed by Justice J S Khehar, the company pleaded the court to allow it to withdraw the petition.
The Airlines had moved the Supreme Court challenging the high court's January 29 verdict that allowed a consortium of banks to take possession of Kingfisher House.
The banks seeking possession and sale of the property are State Bank of India, Axis Bank Ltd, Bank of Baroda, Bank of India, Central Bank of India, Corporation Bank, Federal Bank Ltd, IDBI Bank Ltd, Indian Overseas Bank, Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd, Punjab & Sind Bank, Punjab National Bank, State Bank of Mysore, UCO Bank, and United Bank of India. 

Man Fined for Throwing out Tenant’s Belongings



Published: 26th July 2014 08:32 AM


CHENNAI: A house owner who had thrown out his tenants by force has been asked by the Madras high court to pay 50,000 as compensation to the evicted tenants. 

"The right of persons who come to court cannot be allowed to end in an illegal manner," observed Justice 8%B Rajendran, who then said A Jagajothi of Gudalur in the Nilgiris district was entitled to at least 50,000 as compensation, as she and her family members had been illegally thrown out of the rented house. 

In her petition, Jagajothi said that she was living with her family in a rented a house near a government school in Gudalur, owing to certain differences of opinion with the school headmaster, her husband had lodged a police complaint against him. A few days later, after the police complaint created tension, their house owner tried to evict them in the middle of her daughter's academic year. As pleas for extension did not help, she filed a civil suit. Even while the suit was pending, the house owner threw out all her belongings. Police did not take any action despite complaints, which forced her to file the present case in the Madras high court. The house owner's son, denying the allegations and questioning the admissibility of the petition wherein his father had not been impleaded as party, said Jagajothi moved the court to gain sympathy. 

Justice Rajendran, finding merit in the tenant's case, said her right had to be safeguarded. He awarded a compensation of 50,000, and asked court authorities to implead Kathirvel as a party to the proceedings 

RBI fines 12 banks in DCHL loan default case


No Advocate Clean enough to be Judge ?







TNN 24 July 2014

Friday, July 25, 2014

The true facts about the corrupt Madras High Court Judge

Justice Markandey Katju, 24 July 2014

Many people have asked why i did not speak out in 2005 about the incident relating to the corrupt Judge of Madras High Court when it happened that year. My reply is : I was a sitting Judge  (Chief Justice of Madras High Court) at that time, and judicial discipline and the unwritten code of conduct requires that a Judge should not go into the public domain. So I could not have gone to the press. But I was not silent. I informed the then Chief Justice of India, both in writing as well as orally when I met him in Delhi, about the full facts, and requested him to order a secret IB enquiry, which he did, and the IB report proved that what I said about that Judge was correct. I retired in September 20011, and it was only when some Tamilians wrote on my facebook page that I should write about some of my experiences as Chief Justice of Madras High Court that I wrote about it.

 Moreover, the important question is not about timing, but whether what i said was correct or not. I posed 6 specific questions for Justice Lahoti ( the then CJI) to answer, but he did not, and instead said that he will not stoop to the level of someone else ( implying me). Let the people decide who has stooped. Justice Ruma Pal, who was at that time on the 3 Judge Supreme Court Collegium ( consisting of Justices Lahoti, Sabarwal and Ruma Pal ) has vindicated me  ( see front page of Hindustan Times today ). Also, the letter of the then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh putting pressure to continue that corrupt Judge has now come to light, as well as the written comment of Justice Lahoti that the sensitivities of the government should be taken into account ( meaning that the Judges should surrender to political pressure ).

In today's Punjab Kesari Hindi Newspaper (24.07.2014) it is stated in the front page in a special editorial by Mr. Ashwini Kumar, the editor, that if Justice Ashok Kumar was a corrupt judge, I should not have recommended him for elevation to the High Court. In fact, I never recommended him but it was my predecessor who recommended him. I became Chief Justice of Madras High Court in November 2004, whereas Justice Ashok Kumar had become the Additional Judge of the High Court in April 2003.

In the said editorial Mr. Ashwini Kumar asks why I did not do anything when I found he was corrupt. The truth is that I immediately requested the CJI to get a secret IB enquiry held, which was held and he was found to be corrupt. Thereafter, it was for the CJI to do the needful. I could not go into the public domain as it is against judicial discipline and unwritten code of conduct for judges that they should not go into the public domain.

Thursday, July 24, 2014

சென்னை: உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியாக சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கவுல் வரும் 26ம் தேதி பதவியேற்கிறார்.


சென்னை: உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியாக சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கவுல்

தினகரன் 24 ஜூலை, 2014 

சென்னை: உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியாக சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கவுல்  வரும் 26ம் தேதி பதவியேற்கிறார். அவருக்கு ஆளுநர் ரோசய்யா பதவிப்  பிரமாணம் செய்து வைக்கிறார். 

சென்னை உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதியாக இருந்த ராஜேஷ்குமார்  அகர்வால் உச்ச நீதிமன்ற நீதிபதியாக பதவியேற்றதையடுத்து, தலைமை  நீதிபதி பணியிடம் கடந்த 5 மாதங்களாக காலியாக உள்ளது. நீதிபதி  சதீஷ்குமார் அக்னிஹோத்ரி தற்காலிக தலைமை நீதிபதியாக  செயல்பட்டு வருகிறார். 

 இந்நிலையில், உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை  நீதிபதியாக பஞ்சாப், அரியானா உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதி சஞ்சய்  கிஷன் கவுலை நியமனம் செய்ய உச்ச நீதிமன்ற தலைமை நீதிபதி  ஆர்.எம்.லோதா அடங்கிய நீதிபதிகள் குழு முடிவு செய்தது. 

அதன் படி  புதிய தலைமை நீதிபதிக்கான ஒப்புதலை ஜனாதிபதி பிரணாப் முகர்ஜி  வெளியிட்டார். இதையடுத்து, வரும் 26ம் தேதி புதிய தலைமை நீதிபதி  சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கவுல் பதவியேற்கிறார். அவருக்கு தமிழக ஆளுநர்  ரோசய்யா பதவிப் பிரமாணம் செய்து வைக்கிறார். 

ஆளுநர் மாளிகையில் 26ம் தேதி காலை 11.30 மணிக்கு பதவியேற்பு  நிகழ்ச்சி நடைபெறுகிறது. நீதிபதி சஞ்சய் கிஷன் கவுல், டெல்லியில்  1958ல் பிறந்தார். 

1976ல் பொருளாதார பட்டம் பெற்ற இவர், 1982ல்  டெல்லியில் சட்டப் படிப்பை முடித்து டெல்லி பார் கவுன்சிலில் பதிவு  செய்தார். சிவில், ரிட், கம்பெனி சட்ட வழக்குகளில் அதிக அனுபவம்  பெற்ற இவர் 2001 மே 3ல் டெல்லி உயர் நீதிமன்ற கூடுதல் நீதிபதியாக  நியமிக்கப்பட்டார். 

பின்னர் 2003ல் நிரந்தரம் செய்யப்பட்டார். 2013  ஜனவரி 6 முதல் பஞ்சாப், அரியானா உயர் நீதிமன்ற தலைமை  நீதிபதியாக பதவி வகித்து வருகிறார்.

Maximum customer grievances against SBI: ombudsman

Maximum customer grievances against SBI: ombudsman
SBI, with 1,960 complaints from customers, is followed by Indian Bank with 910 and Indian Overseas Bank with 740.

Among the private sector banks, ICICI Bank with 682 complaints is on top of the list, followed by HDFC Bank (560 ), Standard Chartered Bank (440) and Axis Bank (326).

Announcing this at a press conference here, U. Chiranjeevi, Banking Ombudsman (Tamil Nadu, Puducherry and Andaman and Nicobar Islands), said due to improved awareness among consumers the total number of complaints received in his region has gone up by 21 per cent during the year 2013-14.

He said 8,775 complaints were received during the year against 7,255 last year. “And, close to 7,000 of them were maintainable, excluding the 241 complaints, which are under process,” he said.

According to him, more than 97 per cent of them were disposed. Majority (21.93 per cent) of the complaints received during the year were about lapses in the process of loans and advances.

This is followed by complaints about debit cards, credit cards and ATM related issues (21.73 per cent)