Showing posts with label king fisher. Show all posts
Showing posts with label king fisher. Show all posts

Monday, August 12, 2013

Lenders take possession of Kingfisher Airlines’ headquarters



The group of 14 lenders led by State Bank of India (SBI) expects to recover at least Rs1,000 crore as it starts taking possession of buildings, helicopters and other fixed assets of the grounded airline, the bankers said. Photo: Abhijit Bhatlekar/Mint
The group of 14 lenders led by State Bank of India (SBI) expects to recover 
at least Rs1,000 crore as it starts taking possession of buildings, helicopters 
and other fixed assets of the grounded airline, the bankers said. 
Photo: Abhijit Bhatlekar/Mint
live Mint: Mon, Aug 12 2013. 01 03 PM IST
Lenders have taken over ‘Kingfisher House’ as part of the second phase of recovering loans from the airline

Aconsortium of banks has taken possession of Kingfisher Airlines Ltd’s headquarters at Vile Parle in Mumbai as a part of its efforts at recovering loans from the grounded airline.
Two bankers confirmed that the lenders have taken over “Kingfisher House” near Mumbai’s domestic airport as part of the second phase of recovering loans from the Vijay Mallya-promoted airline and will start proceedings to sell the office
They did not want to be identified.
A senior airline executive, requesting anonymity, said the banks on Saturday had send “a caution notice” to Kingfisher Airlines, barring transactions on the office, adding that “they have not restricted entry to staffers or sealed the property.”
The group of 14 lenders led by State Bank of India (SBI) expects to recover at least Rs.1,000 crore as it starts taking possession of buildings, helicopters and other fixed assets of the grounded airline, the bankers said.
The consortium collected Rs.550-600 crore in the first phase by selling pledged shares of associate companies of Kingfisher Airlines’ parent UB Group.
Kingfisher’s operating licence was suspended in October by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation following a strike by the airline’s employees.
The permit has since expired, although it can be renewed within two years.
The bankers had already filed a claim on 3 May under the Sarfaesi (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) Act to recover dues.
Under the claim, the bankers had given 60 days’ notice to airline and it had expired on 1 July.
The banks had started procedures for taking over properties and other assets in the first week of July in consultation with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT).
This marks the last round of a bitter battle in one of corporate India’s most high-profile loan default cases. The lenders will be selling the airline’s properties in Mumbai and Goa, two helicopters, other fixed assets and shares of UB Group companies.
SBI has the maximum exposure to Kingfisher in the consortium at Rs.1,600 crore, followed by Punjab National Bank (Rs.800 crore), IDBI Bank Ltd (Rs.800 crore), Bank of India (Rs.650 crore), Bank of Baroda(Rs.550 crore), United Bank of India (Rs.430 crore), Central Bank of India (Rs.410 crore), UCO Bank (Rs.320 crore), Corporation Bank (Rs.310 crore), State Bank of Mysore, an SBI associate bank (Rs.150 crore), Indian Overseas Bank (Rs.140 crore), Federal Bank Ltd (Rs.90 crore), Punjab and Sind Bank (Rs.60 crore) and Axis Bank Ltd (Rs.50 crore).
Their overall exposure is Rs.6,360 crore, which increases to about Rs.7,000 crore adding unapplied interest.
There are three lenders outside the consortium—Srei Infrastructure Finance LtdJammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd and Oriental Bank of Commerce.
The lenders have also asked Srei Infrastructure Finance not to go through the legal processes but to sell Kingfisher Airlines shares pledged with them in the open market.
Srei bought the loan from ICICI Bank Ltd and, as per the arrangement, if the value of the shares that it took as collateral exceeds its exposure, the consortium will get the money.
A Kingfisher Airlines spokesperson declined comments.
Under the Sarfaesi Act, only assets that are mortgaged with banks can be recovered, while DRT allows taking possession of any asset held by a defaulting borrower, irrespective of whether these are pledged with banks or not. The DRT process, however, is a long one.
While recovering through court cases, without taking help of Sarfaesi or DRT, if a borrower has to contest a claim by a banker, the borrower has to deposit 75% of the contested amount upfront with the court.
However, courts frequently waive this requirement.
On Saturday, Kingfisher Airlines chief executive officer Sanjay Aggarwal held a meeting with its senior management fuelling the rumours of restarting of the airline.
“It was a routine meeting with management about maintaining air worthiness and other engineering standards as per Director General of Civil Aviation’s rules. We have not discussed any restart plans on Saturday,” said another Kingfisher Airlines’ executive, who also requested anonymity.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Fresh loan recoveries from Kingfisher set to start

The lenders collected `550-600 crore in the first phase by selling pledged shares of associate companies of Kingfisher Airlines’s parent UB Group. Photo: Mint
The lenders collected Rs.550-600 crore in the first phase by selling pledged shares of associate companies of Kingfisher Airlines’s parent UB Group. Photo: Mint

P R sanjai Anup Rai : Live Mint :Tue, Jun 25 2013. 11 31 PM IST
A group of 14 lenders led by SBI expects to recover at least Rs.1,000 cr from the grounded airline


Mumbai: The second phase of recovering loans from Kingfisher Airlines Ltd will begin early next month, according to two bankers familiar with the plan.
A group of 14 lenders led by State Bank of India (SBI) expects to recover at least Rs.1,000 crore as it starts taking possession of buildings, helicopters and other fixed assets of the grounded airline, the bankers said, both declining to be identified.
The lenders collected Rs.550-600 crore in the first phase by selling pledged shares of associate companies of Kingfisher Airlines’s parent UB Group.
Kingfisher’s operating licence was suspended in October by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation following a strike by the airline’s employees.
The permit has since expired, although it can be renewed within two years.
“We have already filed a claim on 3 May under the Sarfaesi (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) Act to recover dues,” said an SBI executive, one of the two bankers mentioned above. “Under the claim, we have to give 60 days notice to airline and it will expire on 1 July.”
The banks will start taking possession of properties and other assets in the first week of July in consultation with the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), he said.
This marks the last round of a bitter battle in one of corporate India’s most high-profile loan default cases. The lenders will be selling the airline’s properties in Mumbai and Goa, two helicopters, other fixed assets and shares of UB Group companies.
SBI has the maximum exposure to Kingfisher at Rs.1,600 crore, followed by Punjab National Bank (Rs.800 crore), IDBI Bank (Rs.800 crore), Bank of India (Rs.650 crore), Bank of Baroda (Rs.550 crore), United Bank of India (Rs.430 crore), Central Bank of India (Rs.410 crore), UCO Bank (Rs.320 crore), Corporation Bank (Rs.310 crore), State Bank of Mysore, an SBI associate bank (Rs.150 crore), Indian Overseas Bank (Rs.140 crore),Federal Bank Ltd (Rs.90 crore), Punjab and Sind Bank (Rs.60 crore) and Axis Bank Ltd (Rs.50 crore). Overall, their exposure is Rs.6,360 crore, which increases to about Rs.7,000 crore adding unapplied interest.
The lenders have also asked Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd not to go through legal processes but to sell Kingfisher Airlines shares pledged with them in the open market, the SBI banker quoted above said. “They have agreed to do so,” he said.
There are three lenders outside the consortium—Srei Infrastructure Finance, Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd and Oriental Bank of Commerce.
Srei bought the loan from ICICI Bank Ltd and, as per the arrangement, if the value of the shares that it took as collateral exceeds its exposure, the consortium will get the money.
A Kingfisher Airlines spokesperson declined comments.
Under the Sarfaesi Act, only assets that are mortgaged with banks can be recovered, while DRT allows taking possession of any asset held by a defaulting borrower, irrespective of whether these are pledged with banks or not. The DRT process, however, is a long one.
While recovering through court cases, without taking help of Sarfaesi or DRT, if a borrower has to contest a claim by a banker, the borrower has to deposit 75% of the contested amount upfront with the court. However, courts frequently waive this requirement.
However, the court may decide not to waive this in the case of Kingfisher as court rulings have gone in favour of banks so far.
In that case the court will likely insist that KFA submits 75% of the contested amount with it, said a retired banker who specialized in DRT cases at a large public sector bank. But since Kingfisher Airlines is not in a position to submit such a huge sum, it will prefer the DRT process, said this person.
“In DRT, there is a number of ways recovery can be delayed. There are layers of delaying tactics and it’s going to be a long-drawn process. For instance, the borrower’s lawyer may demand 60 days interval between every notice served and there are notice after notice,” the banker said.
Besides, even if the DRT rules in favour of the banks, its decision can be challenged in an appellate tribunal. Finally, the case can go to the Supreme Court.
In short, if the DRT route is taken, it will be many years before the banks can recover their dues, the second banker said.



Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Lenders reject Kingfisher Airlines debt recast plan




Source :Sidhartha, TNN | Nov 2, 2011, 03.08AM IST


NEW DELHI: Vijay Mallya-promoted Kingfisher Airlines is back with a debt restructuring plea but banks are unwilling to take a fresh haircut this time citing the company's weak finances and the loss they incurred on converting a part of their loans into equity. In addition, they fear that a fresh recast will force them to treat the loans as a non-performing asset (NPA), in line with the Reserve Bank of India norms. 

Further, they pointed out that Kingfisher was yet to fulfill a part of its commitment which included filing of the assignment agreement for the brand. This agreement with the Registrar of Trademarks would transfer the ownership of the brand to the lenders which will help banks trigger the default clause. 

While Kingfisher has not formally approached lenders with a proposal, bankers said the private airline which has been incurring losses, is looking to raise additional short-term loans, issue lines of credit in lieu of cash deposits lying interest free with lessors, substituting high-cost rupee debt with low-cost foreign currency loans and also raise Rs 2,000 crore via a rights issue. 



Airline executives have, however, raised the issue with government functionaries who have swung into action to see if fresh support from lenders is possible. Kingfisher Airlines CFO A Raghunathan did not respond to a text message and calls. UB Group's head of finance Ravi Nedungadi said he could not speak as he was tied up in meetings. 

Lenders said the biggest stumbling block will be RBI since loans have been restructured more than once and the regulator will now demand downgrading of the asset to NPA category if banks provide fresh succour. In the absence of compliance with earlier stipulated conditions, the task is going to get tougher, they added. Further, they pointed to the loss incurred on conversion of debt into equity. Against the prevailing market price of Rs 40 a share, on March 31 this year, there was preferential allotment to SBI and ICICI Bank due to conversion of compulsorily convertible preference shares into equity shares at a price of Rs 64.48 each, which represented a 60% premium over the prevailing market price. Since the end of March, Kingfisher's share price has declined 40% and closed at Rs 24.10 on Tuesday. "Given the impaired financial position and low security cover, taking additional exposure in the airline is not advisable," said a bank chief. "It is going to be very difficult to convince my board once again," added the head of another bank.