Showing posts with label banks new recovery actions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label banks new recovery actions. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Finance ministry pushes banks to fast-track bad loan recovery


source :12 DEC, 2011, 01.30AM IST, SANGITA MEHTA,ET BUREAU 


MUMBAI: The finance ministry is pushing capital-strapped public sector banks to hasten recovery of bad loans to improve health, and has promised to fill vacancies at debt recovery tribunals (DRT) across the nation, partly responsible for inordinate delays in ending disputes. 

"Needless to say that Rs2 lakh crore (of bad loans) are a drag on the capital of banks," a bureaucrat from the finance ministry wrote to bank chairmen recently. 

"All cases should be reviewed and... ensured that all cases pending above two years should be cleared by March 2012." Banks last year wrote off almost 10% of their gross bad loans as various recovery forums failed. 

Recovery through DRTs fell to 28% of the total referred cases in 2011, from 32% ayear earlier, data from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) shows. 

Under the SARFAESI Act, it was a little better at 38%, compared with 30% in the same period previous year. 

Bankers had complained to the finance ministry that the DRT mechanism was not functioning efficiently, which in turn was making it difficult for them to recover dues. They had said the tribunals lacked presiding officers and recovery officers.

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Banks step up action against defaulting cos










Source : Manju AB Sep 18 2011 , Mumbai fc

Lenders use conversion rights, legal action to recover 

assets

Indian banks are stepping up legal action and usage of conversion rights against defaulting companies as economic slowdown and high interest rates lower debt repayment capabilities of companies.

One of the latest co­mpanies to face music are Zo­om Developers. Len­ders, led by Punjab National Bank, have referred the engineering and project implementation company to the debt recovery tri­bunal after a corporate de­bt res­tructuring (CDR) sch­eme failed to take off. Zoom has Rs 2,700 crore in loans and guarantees outstanding to 26 public sector and private sector banks.

Another defaulting company that faced action recently was GTL. On July 26, ICICI Bank invoked 2.85 crore shares, which accounted for 29.30 per cent stake in the telecom infrastructure provider, that were pledged by Global Holding Corporation, one of its promoter group firms.

Before that IDBI Bank had converted part of the debt of Ispat Industries to equity when the steelmaker defaulted, putting pressure on the company to repay the rest.

MVS Seshagiri Rao, joint managing director and group CFO of JSW Steel, said economic slowdown and high interest rates were putting stress on companies, forcing banks to step up action.

“When we took over Ispat in December 2010, IDBI Bank had already exercised the option of conversion right by which the bank converted part of the debt to equity. Later, we refinanced the entire debt,” Rao said.

In the case of Zoom, a senior official of PNB said they had approached the debt recovery tribunal to attach the company’s properties so that banks could recover the dues.“The CDR scheme is to make companies viable but in this case the business model is not viable. However, we have fully provided for our exposure so there will be no impact on the balance sheet,” the official said.

An official involved in the CDR scheme said, “Under the scheme, banks had to provide additional guarantees of Rs 750 crore, which were later struck down by the banks as the company was not keen to revive its business.” The company was also facing CBI investigation for financial irregularities.

No company official was available for comments despite calls made to its offices in Mumbai. The company website showed it was under construction.

The CDR scheme of the Reserve Bank of India helps companies in distress to extend the tenure of loans and get interest written off so that they can become operationally efficient. However, in the case of Zoom Developers, bankers concluded that writeoffs would not help the company.

Zoom Developers’ debt became a non-performing asset in 2009 when the company, which imports plants and machinery and installs indigenous plants, delayed payments to banks.