Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Indian Banks' Exposure To Dubai
November 30 2009, 11:46:
MAHRUKH ADAJANIA & SREEKANTH AKULA, NOMURA ASIA RESEARCH
This note highlights the exposure of India banks to Dubai.
Bank of Baroda's exposure to Dubai accounts for 2% of its
total assets and 7% of its international assets.
For all other large banks exposure is not significant.
Summary
Except for Bank of Baroda,
no bank has provided quantitative details of its Dubai exposures.
Among non-banks, Kotak Mahindra Bank has insurance policies
generated from Dubai, runs an offshore mutual fund and has
other investments and broking revenuescoming out of Dubai.
ICICI Bank
ICICI Bank management provided the following details
• Loans for the UAE region are booked at the Bahrain branch.
The Bahrain balance sheet is US$6bn. Separate Dubai exposure is
not available.
• Non-India corporate exposure in Dubai is not material.
• India exposure to Dubai is with recourse to the parent’s balance sheet.
• The bank does not see any material impact from the current environment.
Valuation Methodology:
We value ICICI Bank's core business at 1.7x P/BV FY11F.
We have valued life insurance at 20x one-year forward
new business profit, asset management at 7% of equity
funds and 2% of debt funds, ICICI Ventures at 18x one-year
forward earnings, general insurance at 10x one-year
forward P/E, ICICI Securities at 18x one-year forward P/E
and I-Sec PD at 5x one-year forward P/E. We have applied
a 15% subsidiary discount to arrive at our final
consolidated subsidiary value.
Risks Which May Impede the Achievement of the Price Target:
Upside risks to our estimates from faster-than-expected growth:
we build in 5% loan growth for FY10F and 15% for FY11F.
We believe the bank could review its strategy of slow growth
in certain segments, especially mortgages if there are
favourable policy changes, such as tax sops in the budget.
Downside risks to our earnings estimates: slower-than-expected
economic growth, a rapid rise in bond yields owing to rising
fiscal deficit and increasing global stress that will hurt ICICI's
international book, are key downside risks to our estimates.
State Bank of India
SBI only has a representative office in Dubai.
The bank was granted a full-fledged banking license
at end-September 2009. It is trying to build out
business and has no significant exposure to Dubai yet.
Valuation Methodology:
We value SBI using a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation,
valuing the banking and non-banking businesses separately.
Our 12-month price target of INR2,590 for SBI comprises
INR2,356 for the banking business and INR231 for subsidiaries.
Our price target for the core bank is derived using a target
RoE of 17.1% and CoE of 12.0% arriving at a multiple
of 1.8x P/BV. Our fair value of INR231 for the subsidiaries
comprises insurance and asset management business.
We have valued life insurance at 18x oneyear
forward NBAP (New business acheived profit).
We have valued SBI's asset management business
at 3% of debt funds and 7% of equity funds.
Risks Which May Impede the Achievement of the Price Target:
A faster than expected rise in rates or slower than expected
loan growth are key risks to our ratings and price targets
for Indian banks.
Bank of Baroda
• BoB's total exposure to Dubai is US$833mn or
INR40bn, which is 7% of total international
assets and 2% of total assets as of September 2009.
Total exposure to UAE is INR100bn or US$2bn.
The numbers provided by management are lower
than street estimates.
• BoB's exposure to Dubai World is US$200mn and
the first repayment is due only in 2011 and the
next one in 2013.
• Over and above Dubai World, BoB has an exposure
of US$120mn to other Gulf properties. We estimate
that at least 60% of this would be to Dubai.
• BoB does not have exposure to Nakheel.
• The exposure to both Dubai and UAE is diversified
between local and trade finance exposure but no
proportion has been made available.
• The gross NPLs on the total Dubai balance sheet
are low at 0.3% and net NPLs are zero.
• All property exposures in Dubai are standard
accounts as of now.
• BoB stopped lending to Dubai real
estate 1.5 years ago.
• BoB has said that it will revert on the size
of the Dubai balance sheet.
• Other than Dubai, BoB has exposure to other Emirates
nations, including the Abu Dhabi government.
• UAE operations account for 12% of BoB's earnings but
the proportion of earnings from Dubai is not known.
HDFC
• HDFC has a representative office in Dubai
to finance India property. HDFC does not have Dubai exposure.
Valuation Methodology:
We value the core business at INR1,264 and
subsidiaries at INR702, which gives us our
consolidated fair value of INR1,970.
We have valued the core business on a sustainable
RoE of 22.9% and CoE of 11.4%, which yields a P/BV multiple
of 3.2x. We have valued life insurance at 18x FY11E NBAP.
We have valued HDFC’s stake in its asset management company
at 7% of equity funds and 2% of debt funds.
Risks Which May Impede the Achievement of the Price Target:
(1) Subsidiary valuations have moved up sharply in the
recent past, driven by strong business performance.
In our valuations, HDFC's subsidiaries account for
more than 30% of the fair value. Hence, stronger-than-expected
performance by the subsidiaries could provide upside to our
valuation. The two largest subsidiaries are the life
insurance business and HDFC Bank. We estimate taht a
life insurance premium CAGR of 58% over FY07-FY10,
compared with our current assumption of a 48% CAGR,
would add INR50, or 2%, to fair value.
(2) Continued strong performance in a period of
prolonged sector weakness would warrant a premium,
in our view. (3) The current strong performance
has likely been driven by HDFC's ability to deliver
in a severely weak mortgage market in the past
two quarters. If the housing market were to witness
prolonged weakness in the
next quarters as HDFC sustained its growth rates,
we believe the market would likely ascribe a premium
to the franchise value of HDFC, which is a potential
upside risk too.
Axis Bank
• The Dubai balance sheet is 1.3% of Axis
Bank’s total balance sheet.
Other banks operating out of South India,
such as Federal Bank and South Indian Bank,
could be sourcing a lot of their deposits from
Dubai.
Valuation Methodology:
We value Axis Bank at 2.5x P/BV FY11 (sustainable
RoE of 19.4% and growth rate of 7%).
Risks Which May Impede the Achievement of the Price Target:
A faster-than-expected rise in interest rates and higher
delinquencies are key risks to our rating and price
target for Axis Bank.
RBI WILL ASK BANKS TO PROVIDE DETAILS OF THEIR DIRECT AND INDIRECT EXPOSURE TO DUBAI
NOV 30, 2009
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on Friday said it would
ask banks to furnish details of their direct and indirect
exposure to Dubai World, the beleaguered Dubai government-owned
holding company which asked for more time to repay its debt.
While RBI played down the issue, it emerged that Bank of Baroda (BoB)
had an exposure of around $200 million (Rs 928 crore at Friday’s rates)
to Dubai World, a senior bank executive said. “The amount is due for
repayment only after 2011. It is paying interest and there are no
overdues. So, we have absolutely no immediate concern,” a senior
bank executive said.
The bank’s total exposure in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
was estimated at around Rs 10,000 crore, of which, the share
of Dubai was around Rs 4,000 crore, the executive said.
Though the public sector player had an exposure of
around Rs 600 crore to real estate companies in the UAE,
the executive added that the lender was not exposed to Nakheel,
Dubai World’s real estate arm, which has borne the brunt of an
almost 50 per cent drop in real estate prices.
Investors reacted negatively to news of BoB’s exposure to Dubai
World. The bank’s scrip fell 4.64 per cent on the Bombay Stock
Exchange (BSE) to close the day at Rs 521.40.
Axis Bank, ICICI Bank and Indian Overseas Bank (IOB), among others,
have exposure to companies operating in Dubai and the UAE.
While IOB said its exposure was to the tune of $15-16 million
(around Rs 70 crore), a senior executive at Axis Bank said the
lender had an exposure of less than $10 million (around Rs 46 crore)
to the Dubai arm of an Indian real estate developer,
“but no significant exposure otherwise”.
When contacted, a spokesperson for ICICI Bank said,
“ICICI Bank has no material non-India linked
exposure to Dubai companies.”
A senior Bank of India executive said the public sector
player neither had branches in West Asia, nor and any direct
exposure to real estate companies in the region.
It had two Indian clients with interests in real estate
and construction in Dubai. The total exposure to these
companies, whose names he refused to disclose, was pegged
at $21 million (around Rs 100 crore). “These are performing
assets and we do not expect much problem in repayments,” he added.
“We will ask banks to furnish the details regarding their
exposure in Dubai World,”
RBI Deputy Governor Shyamala Gopinath told reporters in Ahmedabad.
RBI Governor D Subbarao said, “We should not react instantly.
We must first study the development and measure the strength
of the problem,” when asked about the impact of
the developments in Dubai on India.
KPMG TO REPRESENT BANKS WHO LENT MONEY TO DUBAI WORLD
DEC 1, 2009
Banks who lent money to Dubai World, the debt-laden
state investment group, reportedly plan to appoint
auditors KPMG to represent them in talks over recovering
their money.
British newspaper The Independent reported that
the banks include HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland,
Lloyds Banking Group, and Standard Chartered.
The banks’ total loans to Dubai World
exceeds US$ 30 billion.
It added that KPMG will be formally appointed
once the creditor banks have created a steering
committee comprising five or six of the main
lenders to lead the negotiations.
KPMG was not immediately available to comment.
Dubai said last week that it would delay payment on
debt issued by Dubai World and property developer
Nakheel, igniting fears over sovereign debt
defaults and sending global markets sharply lower.
Dubai World and Nakheel have oustanding debt of US$ 59 billion.
Source:The Independent
Banks who lent money to Dubai World, the debt-laden
state investment group, reportedly plan to appoint
auditors KPMG to represent them in talks over recovering
their money.
British newspaper The Independent reported that
the banks include HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland,
Lloyds Banking Group, and Standard Chartered.
The banks’ total loans to Dubai World
exceeds US$ 30 billion.
It added that KPMG will be formally appointed
once the creditor banks have created a steering
committee comprising five or six of the main
lenders to lead the negotiations.
KPMG was not immediately available to comment.
Dubai said last week that it would delay payment on
debt issued by Dubai World and property developer
Nakheel, igniting fears over sovereign debt
defaults and sending global markets sharply lower.
Dubai World and Nakheel have oustanding debt of US$ 59 billion.
Source:The Independent
RBI TO SET UP WORKING GROUP TO REVISIT THE DRAFT GUIDELINES ON CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS (CDS)
NOV 27, 2009
The Reserve Bank plans to set up a working group to
revisit the draft guidelines on credit default swaps
(CDS) in view of the changed market scenario,
deputy governor Shyamala Gopinath said here today.
“We are setting up a group in the RBI and they will
interact with market participants,” Gopinath said at
a banking seminar here. A credit default swap is a
swap contract in which the buyer of the CDS makes a
series of payments to the seller and, in exchange,
receives a payoff if a credit instrument goes into default.
The apex bank placed the draft guidelines on CDS on
its website for public comments in October 2007,
much before the financial crisis hit the world economies.
Later, she told reporters the central bank has a capital
account management framework and is monitoring developments
closely. “We have a capital account management framework.”
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Indian banking makes U S jealous
Nov 28, 2009
After 31st March 2010 Indian banks will have to adhere to the Basel
II norms. India had adopted Basel I guidelines in 1999.
Later on in February 2005 the RBI had issued draft guidelines
for implementing a New Capital Adequacy Framework, in line with
Basel II.
The deadline for implementing Basel II, originally set
for March 31, 2007, has now been extended. Foreign banks in India
and Indian banks operating abroad will have to adhere to the guidelines
by March 31, 2009.
So let us dig what is this Basel II al about and
how it will affect the Indian
Banking sector.
Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords,


After 31st March 2010 Indian banks will have to adhere to the Basel
II norms. India had adopted Basel I guidelines in 1999.
Later on in February 2005 the RBI had issued draft guidelines
for implementing a New Capital Adequacy Framework, in line with
Basel II.
The deadline for implementing Basel II, originally set
for March 31, 2007, has now been extended. Foreign banks in India
and Indian banks operating abroad will have to adhere to the guidelines
by March 31, 2009.
So let us dig what is this Basel II al about and
how it will affect the Indian
Banking sector.
What is Basel II?

which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by
the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. The purpose of Basel II,
which was initially published in June 2004, is to create an internationl
standard that banking regulators can use when creating regulations
about how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against
the types of financial and operational risks banks face.
Basel II uses a “three pillars” concept – (1) minimum capital
requirements (addressing risk), (2) supervisory review and
(3) market discipline – to promote greater stability in the financial system.

Let’s dig out how all the three above pillars will bring
changes in the Indian banking segment.
The first concept deals with minimum capital requirements.
This is one of the most important and prime tool which makes our Indian Banking Sector jealous.
Banks have to keep aside 9 % capital againstØ various risks.
The risk consist of interest rate risk in the banking book,
foreign exchange risk, liquidity risk, business cycle risk, reputation
risk, strategic risk. This rate is expected to increase after much
talked about Basel II norms come into place. So all the above
risk will makethe Indian banking sector more secured and more
stable just like the one during the US financial crisis.
In other words it can be described as the minimum amount
of capital a Bank should maintain to cover its various business risks.
This might affect the credit growth of banks since in first place
Indian Banks are basically born skeptical which also acts as
a boon in times of crisis. Banks will have to increase their
margins for providing loans and moreover may reduce the
rate of percentage of sanctions they make in usual conditions.
Now a question might come up in the mind that what will
be the affect on loans-this will be answered after 31st March 2010
when Basel II comes in to play.
The second pillar of Basel II is supervisory review.
Banks have been given the power by which they will not o
nly maintain the minimum capital requirements but will also
be able to have a process by which they can assess their
capital adequacy themselves. This process, and its assessment
by the supervisory authority, is central to the second pillar
of the Basel II Accord.
This also ensures that banks will be able to make
arrangements to ensure that they hold enough capital to
cover all their risks. The prime responsibility will lie on
the individual banks to compile with the norms.
This review process will provide benefits when another
financial crisis will hit in the future. We should not forget
that when the US banks were getting sold out the
Indian Banking segments stood still as if nothing has happened.
That’s why we can go off to sleep when our prime wealth
is being safely preserved inthe Indian banks.
It works in this frame work shown below.

The last but the most important one of Basel II is market discipline.
The recent financial crisis in US and the bailouts of the
Century old Banks have raised the voice of market discipline.
This is one of the most important pillar of any financial process.
Market Discipline in banking and financial sector is highly
required in coming days as more globalization will expand.
Market discipline as per Basel II focuses on:
To achieve increased transparency through expanded
disclosure requirements for banks.
This will make sure that the banks are well positioned
to handle the complex business process.
This will bring transparency in the process followed
with adequate updating to the banking regulators on
the involved process of the various banks in dealing
complex products.
So over all it can be concluded that with the advent
of Basel II, banks with a risk appetite, i.e. high
risk – high return lending strategy or lending without
proper appraisal merely to generate additional business
will find the going tough. We believe that such business
models, which take disproportionately high risks, will not
survive. The business models, which should survive,
will be where risks are within acceptance levels for the
banks backed by adequate returns.
After implementing Basel II our Indian Banking
will feel more jealous.
by: Indranil Sen Gupta, Research Analyst
UAE banks risk credibility loss on Dubai exposures
DUBAI: The credibility of the United Arab Emirates finance sector will suffer unless the authorities and lenders move quickly to assuage fears
that Dubai's debt trouble are spiraling out of control, analysts and bankers say.
Dubai, one of the seven emirates that make up the UAE, said on Wednesday it planned to restructure one of its holding companies, a shock announcement that triggered global concerns about the emirate's ability to meet its debt obligations.
International banks' exposure related to Dubai World amounts to $12 billion in syndicated and bilateral loans, banking sources said.
"I would say it is a huge shock for the UAE banking sector, and until we have some clarity the current situation will continue to cause damage," said Raj Madha, banking analyst at EFG Hermes.
Regional banks such as Emirates NBD and Mashreq Bank, which play a pivotal role in funding the UAE economy, have not made public statements yet on their exposure.
Dubai, one of the seven emirates that make up the UAE, said on Wednesday it planned to restructure one of its holding companies, a shock announcement that triggered global concerns about the emirate's ability to meet its debt obligations.
International banks' exposure related to Dubai World amounts to $12 billion in syndicated and bilateral loans, banking sources said.
"I would say it is a huge shock for the UAE banking sector, and until we have some clarity the current situation will continue to cause damage," said Raj Madha, banking analyst at EFG Hermes.
Regional banks such as Emirates NBD and Mashreq Bank, which play a pivotal role in funding the UAE economy, have not made public statements yet on their exposure.
"Dubai World and its entities account for a very large chunk of the Dubai economy and its indebtedness and we expect Emirates NBD to have a full share of that," Madha said.
Officials at the Dubai-based bank could not be reached for comment.
UAE banks are exacerbating the situation by remaining silent on their exposures, said another banking analyst at a large international bank, who requested not be named.
"Unless there is clarity from banks, people will just make up numbers, which is worse," he said. "On the whole, the reputation has been damaged."
TRANSPARENCY Officials at the Dubai-based bank could not be reached for comment.
UAE banks are exacerbating the situation by remaining silent on their exposures, said another banking analyst at a large international bank, who requested not be named.
"Unless there is clarity from banks, people will just make up numbers, which is worse," he said. "On the whole, the reputation has been damaged."
The region's financial services sector has already drawn criticism for its lack of disclosure and transparency but some analysts expect the Dubai debt crisis to spark a change.
"The way in which the UAE authorities handle the problem will clearly be important for investor confidence, as it will set a precedent for Dubai," Goldman Sachs analysts said in a note.
"Taking into view the huge reputational risks involved and also the amount of leverage that currently exists in the emirate we believe that the UAE authorities will be more likely to try and secure an orderly restructuring of outstanding liabilities of the two firms," the Goldman analysts said.
As a result of Dubai's debt struggle, banks will continue to face difficulties in the coming quarters.
"We expect asset quality to continue to deteriorate in the coming quarters and this trend could be exacerbated by the direct and indirect impact of a debt restructuring by Dubai World, which represents a major pillar of the Dubai economy," said Standard & Poor's credit analyst Mohamed Damak.
The UAE banks, however, will continue to be supported by the authorities, analysts said.
"I very much doubt that banks will be expected to bear the full burden of their exposure. I think at some level the assets would be or should be bought out by the federal government," EFG's Madha said.
Ratings agency Moody's also said it had no reason to believe that the federal government would abstain from supporting banks in Dubai or in other emirates.
Source: REUTERS
Saturday, November 28, 2009
Plea in court to wind up SPIC unit at Guindy
CHENNAI: The Sakthi Hi-Tech Construction Private Limited
on Moore Street has moved the Madras High Court with a plea
to order the winding up of SPIC Petro Chemicals Limited in Guindy.
Consequently, the company petition from Sakthi Hi-Tech prayed
for a direction to the official liquidator to take over the
management and administration of SPIC as a provisional liquidator.
According to Sanjay Dodeja, counsel for petitioner company, SPIC
placed various purchase orders with the petitioner company for
fabrication and erection of SS tanks and other materials in 1995 and 1996.
Accordingly, petitioner company supplied, erected and executed substantial
parts of the purchase orders as early as in 1996, but SPIC did not perform
its obligation and defaulted in payment of Rs 96 lakh.
SPIC was also entangled in litigation in respect of the project.
By an order, the Madras High Court had also restrained SPIC from
proceeding further with the project. The dues remained unsettled
till date. SPIC had also taken various loans and credit facilities
from several banks, financial institutions and individuals by mortgaging
and hypothecating its movable and immovable property.
Thus, SPIC was neck-deep in debt.
The promoter of SPIC had also entered into an agreement to sell
some of his personal property to True Value Homes for Rs 120 crore
as premium price for a property of 60 grounds in Kotturpuram.
on Moore Street has moved the Madras High Court with a plea
to order the winding up of SPIC Petro Chemicals Limited in Guindy.
Consequently, the company petition from Sakthi Hi-Tech prayed
for a direction to the official liquidator to take over the
management and administration of SPIC as a provisional liquidator.
According to Sanjay Dodeja, counsel for petitioner company, SPIC
placed various purchase orders with the petitioner company for
fabrication and erection of SS tanks and other materials in 1995 and 1996.
Accordingly, petitioner company supplied, erected and executed substantial
parts of the purchase orders as early as in 1996, but SPIC did not perform
its obligation and defaulted in payment of Rs 96 lakh.
SPIC was also entangled in litigation in respect of the project.
By an order, the Madras High Court had also restrained SPIC from
proceeding further with the project. The dues remained unsettled
till date. SPIC had also taken various loans and credit facilities
from several banks, financial institutions and individuals by mortgaging
and hypothecating its movable and immovable property.
Thus, SPIC was neck-deep in debt.
The promoter of SPIC had also entered into an agreement to sell
some of his personal property to True Value Homes for Rs 120 crore
as premium price for a property of 60 grounds in Kotturpuram.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)