Saturday, November 1, 2014

K Srinivasan posted as CBI prosecutor



TNN | Nov 1, 2014, 02.11 AM IST


CHENNAI: Advocate K Srinivasan has been appointed new prosecutor of CBI to handle cases pending before the Madras high court. An order issued by CBI said Srinivasan would hold the post of retainer counsel for three years. 

"You are requested to attend to all matters arising out of criminal appeals, revisions, criminal original petitions and all matters concerning CBI," the October 31 order read.

பஞ்சாப் வங்கி கொள்ளை : மூவர் கைது: ஒருவர் மர்ம மரணம், 39 கிலோ தங்கம் பறிமுதல்

கைது செய்யப்பட்டவர்கள் மற்றும் மீட்கப்பட்ட பொருட்களுடன் காவல்துறையினர். படம்: பிடிஐ
கைது செய்யப்பட்டவர்கள் மற்றும் மீட்கப்பட்ட பொருட்களுடன் . படம்: பிடிஐ

தி இந்து:சனி, நவம்பர் 1, 2014

ஹரியாணா மாநிலம் சோனிபட் பகுதியில் பஞ்சாப் நேஷனல் வங்கியில் சுரங்கம் தோண்டி கொள்ளையடித்த சம்பவம் தொடர்பாக மூன்று பேர் கைது செய்யப்பட்டுள்ளனர்.

 அவர்களிட மிருந்து 39 கிலோ தங்கம், வெள்ளி நகைககள், ரூ. 60 ஆயிரம் ரொக்கம் கைப்பற்றப்பட்டுள்ளது.

முக்கிய குற்றவாளி என சந்தேகிக் கப்படும் ஒருவர் மர்மமான முறையில் இறந்து கிடந்தார். அவர் தற்கொலை செய்து கொண்டிருக் கலாம் எனக் கருதப் படுகிறது.

கொள்ளை

ஹரியாணா மாநிலம் சோனிபட் மாவட்டம் கோஹனா நகரில் பஞ்சாப் நேஷனல் வங்கியின் தலைமைக் கிளையில் கடந்த 26-ம் தேதி சுரங்கம் தோண்டி உள்ளே நுழைந்த கொள்ளையர்கள், அங்கிருந்த ரூ. 40 லட்சம் மற்றும் 84 லாக்கர்களில் இருந்த பொருட் களைக் கொள்ளையடித்துச் சென்றனர்.

இதுதொடர்பாக, தனிப் படை அமைத்து ஹரியாணா காவல் துறையினர் குற்றவாளிகளைத் தேடி வந்தனர். ஹரியாணா காவல்துறைக்கு உதவுவதற்காக, கூட்டுப் புலனாய்வுக் குழு தலைவர் ஆர்.என். ரவியை பிரதமர் அலு வலகம் அனுப்பி வைத்தது.

குற்றப் பின்னணி இல்லாதவர்கள்

இதனிடையே, கொள்ளைச் சம்பவம் தொடர்பாக நான்கு பேர் மீது சந்தேகம் எழுந்தது. அதில் மூன்று பேரை தனிப்படையினர் கைது செய்துள்ளனர்.

அவர்கள் அனைவருமே, சம்ப வம் நடந்த பகுதிக்கு அருகில் உள்ள கத்வால் கிராமத்தைச் சேர்ந்தவர்கள். இவர்கள் மீது பெரிய அளவிலான குற்றச்சாட்டுகள் எதுவும் இதுவரை இல்லை.

அவர்களிடமிருந்து 39 கிலோ தங்கம், வெள்ளி நகைகள் மற்றும் கொஞ்சம் ரொக்கம் கைப்பற்றப்பட்டதாக காவல் துறையினர் தெரிவித்துள்ளனர்.
கைது செய்யப்பட்ட மூவரில் சதீஷ் என்பவர் ரியல் எஸ்டேட் தொழில் செய்து வருகிறார். சுரேந்தர் ஆய்வுக் கூடத்தில் (லேப் டெக்னீஷியன்) பணிபுரிகிறார், பல்ராஜ் விவசாயி. மேலும் ராஜேஷ் என்ற ஒரு நபரை காவல்துறையினர் தேடி வருகின்றனர்.

ஒருவர் மரணம்

இக்கொள்ளைச் சம்பவத்துக்கு மூளையாகச் செயல்பட்டதாகக் கருதப்படும் மஹிபால் என்பவர், பானிபட் சாலையில் நேற்று காலை 3 மணிக்கு இறந்த நிலையில் கண்டறியப்பட்டார். அவர் உடலில் வெளிப்படையாகக் காணத்தக்க காயங்கள் எதுவும் இல்லை.

வங்கிக்குள் செல்வதற்காக, கைவிடப்பட்ட வீட்டிலிருந்து சுரங்கம் தோண்டப்பட்டிருந்தது. மஹிபால் அவ்வீட்டின் உரிமை யாளராவார்.
“கொள்ளைச் சம்பவத்தை அரங்கேற்ற மற்ற நால்வருக்கும் உதவி புரிந்த முக்கியக் குற்றவாளி மஹிபால். தான் பிடிபட்டு விடு வோம் என்ற பயத்தில் அவர் தற்கொலை செய்துகொண்டிருக்க வேண்டும்” என காவல்துறை கண்காணிப்பாளர் அருண் சிங் தெரிவித்துள்ளார்.

இரவில் தோண்டிய சுரங்கம்

மஹிபாலின் பயன்படுத்தப் படாத வீட்டுக்கு தினமும் இரவில் சென்ற குற்றவாளிகள், விடியும் வரை சுரங்கம் தோன்றியுள்ளனர். இரும்புக் கம்பிகளைப் பயன்படுத்தி பாதுகாப்புப் பெட்டகங்களை உடைத்துள்ளனர்.

சுரங்கம் தோண்டும் போது, அவ்வழியாகச் சென்ற தொலை பேசி இணைப்புகள், குடிநீர் குழாய் இணைப்புகள் ஆகியவற்றுக்கு சிறிதும் இடையூறு இல்லாமல் சுரங்கம் தோண்டப்பட்டுள்ளது. மூன்றடி உயரம், 2-3 அடி அகலத் துக்கு சுமார் 100 அடி தொலைவுக்கு சுரங்கம் தோண்டியுள்ளனர்.

எழும் சந்தேகம்

“திருட்டுத் தொழிலில் அனுபவ மற்ற கத்துக்குட்டிகளான இவர்கள், மிக நுட்பமாகத் திட்டமிட்டு, இதை அரங்கேற்றியிருப்பது ஆச்சர்ய மளிக்கிறது. மஹிபாலின் திடீர் மரணம் பல சந்தேகங்களை எழுப்பியுள்ளது.

 உண்மையான கதை இன்னும் வெளிவரவில்லை எனக் கருதுகிறேன். வங்கி ஊழியர் அல்லது வாடிக்கையாளருக்கோ இக்கொள்ளைச் சம்பவத்தில் தொடர்பு இருக்கலாம் என்பதை மறுப்பதிற்கில்லை” என விசாரணை அதிகாரி ஒருவர் தெரிவித் துள்ளார்.

பிடிபட்ட சுரேந்தர்

இது தொடர்பாக காவல்துறை அதிகாரி ஒருவர் கூறும்போது, “கைது செய்யப்பட்ட சுரேந்தர், அந்த பாழடைந்த வீட்டுக்கு அருகே அடிக்கடி சுற்றித் திரிந்ததைப் பார்த்த காவல்துறை தகவலாளி, அதை எங்களுக்கு தெரிவித்தார். 

அவரை கத்வால் கிராமத்தில் பிடித்தபோது, சுரேந்தர் தனது குற்றத்தை ஒப்புக்கொண்டார். கூட்டாளிகள் பெயரையும் சொல்லி விட்டார்” என்றார்.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

BOOKS : "Talking of Justice " -A new book by the first woman high court chief justice

Leila Seth: Words like justice
Leila Seth at her home in Noida. Photo: Pradeep Gaur/Mint
A new book by the first woman high court chief justice offers insights into the causes affecting women today 
Namita Bhandare : Mint: 28 oct 2014
At the sprightly age of 84, Leila Seth is busy planning her schedule. There are literary seminars to attend, talks to be given to schoolchildren, a book that has just been launched and, yes, already, another book to be written.
The latest is barely out. Launched on her 84th birthday on 20 October,Talking Of Justice: People’s Rights In Modern India is a collection of essays on subjects the former chief justice of the Himachal Pradesh high court holds dear: children’s rights, the status of widows, the need for gender sensitization within the judiciary, prisoner rights, the girl child.
Most of these essays began as talks and lectures delivered 1992 onwards, although the material itself has been updated, edited and rewritten for the book. An essay, You’re Criminal If Gay, appeared first in The Times Of Indiasoon after a two-judge Supreme Court bench reversed an earlier court decision to decriminalize homosexuality. And one, Rape: Inside The Justice Verma Committee, is a first-person account of the tumultuous days of December 2012.
photo
Appointed after the gang rape and subsequent death of a young paramedical student in December 2012 that led to national outrage and spontaneous street protests, the three-member commission included Seth, former chief justice of India J.S. Verma and former solicitor general Gopal Subramanium. It was given 30 days to recommend amendments to the existing sexual assault laws.
Without waiting for the government to provide it with the necessary facilities, the commission got down to work. Subramanium roped in his entire office and all his juniors. Even Justice Verma’s granddaughter, a student at the University of Oxford, UK, home for the holidays, chipped in. The task was mammoth: Sift through 80,000 suggestions from the public, expert advice from around the world, representations from women’s groups and the lesbian, gay and transgender community, and inputs from the police and administration. It was an intense, hectic time; 15 minutes before the deadline to receive submissions ended, representatives from a political party woke up Justice Verma. It was 11.45pm. They too had an urgent submission, they said, leaving only after a signed receipt from him.
When the 631-page report was presented in just 29 days, there was a sense of disbelief in the packed room at New Delhi’s Vigyan Bhavan. Not only had the commission delivered in such a short time, its recommendations went far beyond the law. It wanted police reforms. It spoke about the need for changes in education, particularly the need for sex education. It wanted changes in The Representation of the People Act that would make candidates charged with rape ineligible to contest elections. It was, in short, a 21st century charter for women. “Our brief was limited to the law,” says Seth. “But we went for the wider scope because we knew that unless our approach was holistic, it would not be enough.”
The then prime minister Manmohan Singh sent “a nice letter of thanks”, recalls Seth. But when the law was finally passed, Parliament baulked. Many of the commission’s significant recommendations—on marital rape and rape by men in the Armed Forces, and on making rape gender neutral, for instance—were left out. The death sentence, not recommended, was added. And the age of juveniles, at least for heinous crimes, is being sought to be lowered to 16 through a Bill introduced this year in Parliament.
Over 18 months have passed since the Justice Verma Commission. Justice Verma died barely three months after the report. There is a new law but the number of reported rape and sexual assault cases is up. Misogyny remains on blatant public display, often from elected representatives themselves.
Yet, seated in her book-embellished home, a grand piano inside and a redchampa tree outside, Seth says she remains an “optimist” because “You cannot live without hope.” The government may not have accepted all the commission’s recommendations, but it is, she says, a “beginning”.
The real challenge lies in changing mindsets. “The changed law provides an immediate remedy. But changing mindsets is a slower process. And that change doesn’t come fast,” she says.
“Nothing can change unless we first start talking. The problem is when you sweep things under the carpet,” says Seth.
The commission’s work is done. But the new conversation around sexual violence, patriarchy and the status of women has not abated.
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
Personally speaking
Leila Seth began her law practice in 1959 in Patna as one of only two women lawyers practising in the high court there. By the time she wrote her first book, an autobiography elegantly titled ‘On Balance’, she was 74. The book was an 80th birthday gift to her husband Premo, now 91.
In 1992, David Davidar, then with Penguin, visited Shimla, where Seth was the chief justice. He was there to read her son Vikram Seth’s manuscript of ‘A Suitable Boy’. It was Davidar who suggested that Seth write her own book. And it was Davidar again, now head of Aleph Book Co., who suggested she write a personal account of her time at the Justice Verma Commission.
Along the way, Seth wrote We, The Children Of India, which explains the Constitution and preamble—which Seth calls the ”soul of our Constitution”—to children. “Children understand things very quickly, they understand concepts of fairness and justice,” says Seth. It is her conversation with children that gives Seth, a grandmother to two girls, Nandini, 13, and Anamika, 10, her energy. “The young today are so confident,” she says. Her next book is a compilation of stories for children, some of them fictional, imparting values without being preachy.
Taking an interest in the world around her and looking to the future drives Seth’s optimism. She travels throughout the country and beyond, attending literary festivals from Bhutan to Bangalore, asking for no special concessions to her age as she bustles about attending sessions in her trademark handloom saris, feet comfortably encased in Crocs.
The changes she has seen, from the Quit India movement and Partition to the protests of December 2012, are astonishing. Significant laws have been passed, and Seth considers reservation for women in panchayats, the right to information and education among the three most significant in the country.
On this journey, Seth has been open to change too. For instance, she says, when she started out in the profession, completing her law degree after the birth of her children, she says she was against the concept of reservation for women. “As I’ve got older, I have begun to realize that women have been put down for so long that reservation is absolutely essential.”
For Seth, a just society is an equally balanced one. “I am one of those who wishes to walk hand in hand, not a step in front or a step behind,” she says.
Namita Bhandare is consulting editor, gender, Mint.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

மாவட்ட நீதிபதிகள் பணியிட மாற்றம்: ஐகோர்ட் உத்தரவு



சென்னை ஐகோர்ட் தலைமை பதிவாளர் பொன்.கலையரசன் வெளியிட்டுள்ள அறிவிக்கையில்,

’’சென்னை 14-வது கூடுதல் மாவட்ட (சி.பி.ஐ) கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதி கே.வெங்கடேஷ்சுவாமி, 13-வது கூடுதல் மாவட்ட (சி.பி.ஐ) கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதியாக நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளார்.

 சென்னை சார்பு நீதிபதி வி.சோபனாதேவி மாவட்ட நீதிபதியாக பதவி உயர்வு பெற்றுள்ளார். எஸ்.மோகனகுமாரி, காஞ்சீபுரம் மாவட்ட கூடுதல் நீதிபதியாகவும், வி.சோபனாதேவி சென்னை 14-வது கூடுதல் சி.பி.ஐ. கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதியாகவும் நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளனர். 

சென்னை முதலாவது கூடுதல் குடும்பநல கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதியாக வி.சாருஹாசினி, சென்னை 2-வது கூடுதல் குடும்பநல கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதியாக ஆர்.கலைமதி, 3-வது கூடுதல் குடும்பநல கோர்ட்டு நீதிபதியாக எஸ்.கோமதிஜெயம் ஆகியோர் நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளனர்’’என்று கூறப்பட்டுள்ளது.

Happy Diwali !!



May You Be showered with
Happiness, Peace and Prosperity
in the coming Days !!

Happy Diwali !!!

Delhi HC stays shifting of DRT to Parliament Street



 

The High today stayed the shifting of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) from its current location in Jhandewalan here to a building in Street. 

A bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru in an interim order put on hold till October 27 the Centre's decision to shift the three benches of DRT from their current location, saying, "Let the tribunals function from their present place." 

"... The Union of to ensure that the tribunals are allowed to function from their current place. They be not shifted without sufficient arrangements being made at the new place," the court said. 

The court passed the order after the DRT Bar Association claimed that the new premises did not have proper parking facilities, places for lawyers and litigants to sit or any amenities. 

They also said that there will be a function in th next few days, and if DRT is moved to the new location it will create a chaos as there would be no place to park the vehicles and power and other facilities are also not fully functional. 

Presently the DRT is being operated from the basement of a building at the RSS Bharat Prakashan-owned Keshav Kunj in Jhandewalan for several years. 

The decision to shift the tribunal to a different location was taken after the RSS filed a suit for eviction, claiming they needed the property for their own offices. 

Earlier this year, the Bar Association was told that the government had decided to shift the DRT to the Jeevan Tara Building at Patel chowk on Parliament Street. 

The DRT was scheduled to be shifted to the Jeevan Tara offices by October 20 and was expected to start functioning from October 27.

SBI Chief Tries to Shift the Blame on NPAs


SBI, SBI Chief, Arundhati Bhattacharya, SBI chairperson Arundhati Bhattacharya

Money control :DEBASHIS BASU | 17/10/2014 04:43 PM |   

Blames lax regulations for high NPAs when the real cause is widespread corruption in public sector banks

The State Bank of India (SBI) chairperson Arundhati Bhattacharya, in an interview with Financial Times, has called for shake up in the regulatory system, as if SBI and its chairman is an outside to the same system.

In the interview, the SBI chief admitted that rates of bad and restructured assets will keep rising for “at least a couple more quarters”, despite having already hit roughly 10% of loans. 

But remarkably for the first time for a chairman of a government-owned bank, she has argued that India needs tougher rules for defaulters, as well as “a proper bankruptcy law to help get orderly resolution of [bad] assets”. “What we need is a little more teeth,” she was quoted while calling for firmer regulations to target indebted tycoons. 

There are three things to note about this new, sudden demand for teeth. 

1. No chairman of state-run lender has ever raised his or her voice about poor regulations that is failing to curb the ever-rising non-performing assets (NPAs).

2. SBI and other banks have never targeted defaulting corporate borrowers with determination to recover monies. Indian borrowers have always felt safe borrowing from the public sector banks knowing fully well that chairmen of these banks have no accountability. 

3. In fact, successive bank chairperson have passed the buck to the next person and retired with full benefits, even as defaults continued to hit the government-owned banks at every economic downturn.

4. The demand for “more teeth” is coming from the State Bank of India but not private sector banks because these banks have negligible bad debts.

5. This merely proves that it is not the recovery laws but lax credit appraisal and totally compromised top management is responsible for abnormally high bad debts in government banks.

Indeed, the same corrupt nexus between public sector banks and it's defaulting borrowers was responsible for band loans reaching 13% of advances in 2001-2002. In response, the government had created Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 designed to help in the recoveries of bad loans. One of the key provisions of the Act is for banks to be able to auction the assets of defaulting borrowers. This law was supposed to wholly aid banks. 

Unfortunately, if the bank officials are corrupt and have lent money without adequate collateral, what auctions will they do? This is why spectacular defaults such as Deccan Chronicle and Kingfisher Airlines have led to no action against defaulters, despite the SARFAESI Act. In addition, SBI has been the biggest lender to Kingfisher. Have you heard of any action against any SBI official, including previous chairman, for what is obviously gross negligence in assessing Kingfisher’s creditworthiness and for not ensuring that the bank’s interests are covered?

In May, the All India Bank Employees' Association (AIBEA), while revealing wilful defaults worth Rs70,300 crore in 400 loan accounts in public sector banks (PSBs), has demanded a detailed probe in to the loan sanctioning and loans turning into bad assets. 

This is bad lending of epidemic proportions. If banks were not confident of the laws that would land them in this huge soup of bad loans, whom did they point this out to and why did they lend? No, these bad loans have only one root: corruption, something that Ms Bhattacharya does not want to talk about.

According to the bank employee's union, over the past seven years, there were fresh bad loans worth Rs4.95 lakh crore only in government banks, while during the same period, these lenders wrote off bad debts worth Rs1.4 lakh crore. Gross non-performing assets (NPAs) and bad loans in the PSBs have increased to Rs1.64 lakh crore as on 31 March 2013 from Rs39,000 crore as on 31 March 2008.

While the unions were demanding stern action against bank defaulters, not a single bank chairman supported it. Moneylife had asked the SBI chief three questions based on her FT interview. The questions were, did not SBI know that the laws were weak; did banks ever tell the RBI or the Finance Ministry about the problems and is SBI saying that the RBI has failed to act like responsible regulator?

Her office replied: "(the) Chairman in her interview had merely emphasized the need for tougher resolution mechanism to put a check on wilful defaulters. Additionally, she also said banks should work in tandem and more closely in consortiums, while lending only to projects that have government regulatory clearances in hand." It also said, "...to draw a link between the 3 questions that you have posed and the relevant interview is far-fetched."

The bank employee unions have been demanding fix responsibility on banks’ top brass for the loans that have turned bad, allow banks to share information on NPAs and wilful defaulters under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, and declare wilful loan default as a criminal offence. 

The fact is despite stringent credit appraisal process and committees to sanction loans, borrowers have siphoned off money from the banking system in connivance with bankers. Once this reaches large proportions that affect the functioning of the banks, the ministry of finance quietly steps in and washes the sins of the banks by recapitalizing them, even as chairman after chairman go scot free.

There is a reason for this perpetual lack of accountability of senior bank officials. Some chairmen are handpicked by ministry and finance minister for their ability to be pliant and sanction dirty loans. The Reserve Bank merely rubber-stamps this selection process. Who will go after the chairman when the MoF is involved and the RBI is hand-off? This is the root of bad loans in India, not lax regulations that Ms Bhattacharya tries to blame